From: | Lionel Smith, Prof. <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca> |
To: | ODG <obligations@uwo.ca> |
Date: | 18/05/2021 16:39:39 |
Subject: | ODG called to action |
Speaking of equitable assignment.. the lengthy and complex judgment of Mr. Justice Foxton in
Serious Fraud Office v Litigation Capital Ltd [2021] EWHC 1272 (Comm), released today, includes ([222]ff) an analysis of the nature of the beneficiary’s interest in a common law trust, with
reference to whether a holder of rights can create multiple trust interests successively, creating a priority problem between them, or whether, having created one ‘equitable title’, that person is unable to create another one. The judge concludes:
[293] On the facts of this case, it is not necessary for me to resolve this question, and with some reluctance given the quality of the parties’ submissions on this issue, I have decided that the issue is
best left to the ruminations of the Obligations Discussion Group until such time as a decision on the point is necessary.
Also released today is a companion case,
Serious Fraud Office v. Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd., [2021] EWHC 1273 (Comm), which contains the most through discussion I have seen in a judgment of ‘backwards tracing’ (tracing through
the payment of a debt).
Lionel